Posted By Denis Barnabas Share

There's an old Acholi proverb: "Land is like a fish with its mouth wide open, waiting to swallow you." If there's one thing that unites the Acholi people, it's the obsession with land.

For the past four or five years I've been observing the growing land conflict in Acholi. The land question has become a leading subject of debate and discussion.

There seem to be many different people who want to have land in Acholi, and they have many ways of getting it. Some have used the government structures; others have simply grabbed it by force. Officers of the Uganda People Defense forces (UPDF) have been accused of amassing huge chunks of land in the region in the wake of the devastating conflict with the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA).

Multinational companies are coming in for criticism, too. Firms from the UK and Germany have also joined the land rush in Uganda, by means both peaceful and dubious. Many people in the country worry that the local people's loss of the right to own and access land completely subverts efforts towards poverty reduction and will instead deepen income disparities, making the poor even poorer.

The majority of Ugandans live in rural areas or villages, so they rely on land as their major source of livelihood. This places land at the centre of any social, political, and economic relationships between individuals and the state. Most of them are peasant or subsistence farmers growing food crops. Cattle raising and grazing are a big part of their way of life.

Some of those who have traveled around the northern part of Uganda see that the land is vast and empty, capable of supporting a much greater population. Others view these huge chunks of land slightly differently, as idle and non-productive. This is certainly true to some extent, since most of the people occupying the land here do not have the capacity to cultivate it or make investments on a larger scale. For many, the LRA War and the displacement that followed it disenfranchised them, also economically.

Having just spent days traveling across northern Uganda, I can confirm that the land is mostly unoccupied, especially as you move away from urban centers.

"When one flies over Acholi land, the entire countryside is just a dark jungle. It looks like land just created by God yesterday, and that God is still thinking about creating human beings to occupy it." That quote comes from the Honorable Okello-Okello John Livingstone, former Chairman, Acholi Parliamentary Groups (APG). (The photo above shows another MP, Gilbert Olanya, addressing the locals in a village in the Amuru district, where people are being evicted to make way for the Uganda Wild Life Authority.)

Many who do not come from the Acholi region have wrongfully presumed that these enormous lands do not have owners. Some have seized the opportunity to settle illegally, turning this alleged "idle land" into commercial ventures, making profits at the expense of the rightful land owners who continue to languish in poverty.

"Land grabbers who use force or tricks to acquire the land will be fought in all possible ways," says Okello-Okello John Livingstone. "They are not different from bank robbers. Land is the only asset that the people of Acholi are left with."

The 1995 Constitution vests ownership of the land in the citizens of Uganda. Article 237 provides for the tenure systems under which land should be owned: customary, freehold, leasehold, and mailo. This was a revolutionary constitution that returned rights to ownership of land to the people. Needless to say, its principles have often been ignored or abused.

Land as a factor of production has become vital in understanding the political economy of Uganda. What I have realized is that the uncontrolled practice of capitalism and land-grabbing in Uganda has become a serious problem.

It has become evident that capitalism is the major root of the problems the ordinary Ugandan citizen experiences, from war, to poverty and crime -- not to mention flagrant land-grabbing, and not only in the northern part of the country, but elsewhere as well.

What is happening in Uganda is totally unacceptable, and there is a desperate need for a solution, but nobody is doing this. The poor are being stripped of their last assets and made poorer. When I was growing up in the early 1990s, the land question almost never came up in the Acholi or Uganda at large. This may have been because the population was relatively small, and people knew their traditional land boundaries.

Following the end of the LRA war and the subsequent displacement, it was easy to foresee that a number of people would become vulnerable and lose their lands precisely in northern Uganda, where many held land without legal documentation. This has been dramatized by the recent land rush and conflict in this region and the controversial Madhvani court ruling. Following the ruling, Judge Wilson Musalu Musene ruled that the local plaintiffs failed to prove that the land they owned was theirs by customary ownership. This was disputed by the community, who saw that they were being robbed of their land.  

As the people in northern Uganda try to return to their land and start their lives anew, land is the only springboard for recovery that they have left. For many, losing their land means losing everything.

Denis Barnabas

 

ZAIN5

10:48 AM ET

March 2, 2012

good

Deutsche Bank announced in September it would offer smaller Postbank shareholders who hold what's called the free float 25 euros per share as part of an effort to consolidate control over Postbank by increasing its 29.95 percent stake. Now, one of those small shareholders, Dusseldorf-based Effecten-Spiegel, is close to filing a legal complaint once the offer is made official.
Germany's financial regulator BaFin had allowed for the shares to be sold at 25 euros, based on a three-month average. Deutsche Bank intends to fund the purchase through 10.2 billion euros ($14.1bn) in capital, raised by issuing 308.6 million new shares at 33 euros each.
Law circumvented?
Marlis Weidtmann, executive director of Effecten-Spiegel, which holds 150,000 Postbank shares, says Deutsche Bank is trying to circumvent laws regulating takeovers.
Deutsche Bank has had a multi-tiered agreement with Postbank's owner, Deutsche Post, since January 2009, in which it agreed to buy the former parent company's 27.4 percent stake for 45 euros a share. But those shares won't actually change hands until 2012, leaving Deutsche Bank with less than 30 percent ownership of Postbank for now and thus free to buy shares for 25 euros each – their average value over the last three months.
Deutsche Post and Deutsche Bank logos
Deutsche Post and Postbank have long gone hand-in-hand
Weidtmann added that the details of the agreement have never been made completely public, but that independent calculations based on widely available information show the shares would be worth at least 36 euros each, if it were to be legally acknowledged that Deutsche Bank has more than a 30 percent stake in Postbank.
“It makes us suspicious, because we have to ask ourselves, ‘What's written in there?'” Weidtmann told Deutsche Welle. “What surprises me is that BaFin has played along thus far.”
A ‘soap ubble'
Bonn-based lawyer Wienand Meilicke, who co-authored the report published in the trade journal ZIP, which valued the Postbank shares at 36 euros, says “a whole lot of people” will be short-changed through Deutsche Bank's plans.
“If someone sticks a needle in this thing the soap bubble will pop,” he told Deutsche Welle. “I am of the opinion that there is a significant chance this case will be successful in court. But that means fighting the German banking establishment.”
According to Weidtmann, Deutsche Bank has so far defended its plans by “always pulling back and making the argument that the shares won't change hands until 2012.”
Tight-lipped
Deutsche Bank's Josef Ackermann and Deutsche Post's Frank Appel in 2008
Deutsche Post and Deutsche Bank have angered smaller shareholders
A Deutsche Bank spokesman told Deutsche Welle the bank “sees no legal grounds for the complaint.”
He referred to the position taken by Frankfurt-based law firm Hengeler Mueller which, in a January 2009 press release, spoke of having advised Deutsche Bank on an “improved transaction structure” for its acquisition of Postbank shares.
A Hengeler Mueller spokesman, however, declined to comment.
Postbank has 24 million retail clients – more than any other bank in Germany – and Deutsche Bank has been working to increase its number of domestic customers. Also, banks will soon be required to hold more capital to safeguard against future financial crises under the new Basel III accord, which will come into force in 2012. Acquiring Postbank will likely help Deutsche Bank meet those requirements.

thanks
cleaning services london

 

MAXIMB

6:22 PM ET

March 22, 2012

Bush should give advice to no

Bush should give advice to no one. He should just shut up for the next few months, then quietly disappear from our sight. maybe go and live off his oil money in Paraguay..

"Is rio orange war always forfait mobile inevitable ?"
MaximB

 

Transitions is the group blog of the Democracy Lab channel, a collaboration between Foreign Policy and the Legatum Institute.

Read More

Latest from Democracy Lab