Transitions

Democracy Lab Weekly Brief, December 16, 2013

To keep up with Democracy Lab in real time, follow us at our new Twitter handle: @FP_DemLab.

Christian Caryl voyages into Mali's Inner Niger Delta and explores the relationship between environmental protection and democracy.

Alex Hanna and Kevan Harris test the theory that social media data can predict elections.

Askold Krushelnycky tracks Kiev's anti-government protests during their most tumultuous -- and violent -- week. Anna Nemtsova sits down with Ukraine's demonstrators to ask them what they want.

Ellen Bork explains that the success of the Cambodian opposition's agenda depends on how well its leaders can play politics.

Daniel Lansberg-Rodríguez describes how women in Egypt are fighting back against all-too-common sexual violence.

Juan Nagel explains the challenges faced by Venezuela's opposition after last week's elections.

Mohamed Eljarh reports on how local leaders hold the key to ending Libya's oil crisis.

And now for this week's recommended reads:

AP reporter Rukmini Callimachi discovers six bodies in a desert grave -- victims of retaliatory violence by Mali's army after the country's recent war.

International Crisis Group questions Burma's faulty civil society legislation and its efforts to better the lawmaking process.

U.N. Women's Constitutional Database compiles the gender-based provisions in constitutions worldwide.

Writing for the New Republic, Emily Parker reveals that some Western journalists censor themselves in fear of China's government.

In the New York Review of Books, Christopher de Bellaigue argues that Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's "vindictive authoritarianism" is fuelling the belief that Islam and democracy don't mix.

On Al Jazeera, Konstantin Parshin writes on how Tajikistan's citizens prefer the stability of authoritarianism to the uncertainty of change.

In the New York Times, Nick Cumming-Bruce disparages the United Nations for failing to act as violence escalates in the Central African Republic.

In the London Review of Books, Owen Bennett-Jones reviews history to explain al Qaeda's resurgence in transitioning countries.

The Diplomat's Zachary Keck argues that the United States has to get better at promoting democracy -- and suggests that focusing on capitalism would be one winning strategy.

(In the photo above, Syrian children build a snowman in a refugee camp in Lebanon, where freezing temperatures have resulted in a number of deaths.)

MAHMOUD ZAYYAT/AFP/Getty Images

Transitions

Local Leaders Resolve Libya's Oil Crisis

On Dec. 10, the head of the Barqa Political Office in eastern Libya announced that it reached a deal with local tribes to reopen Libya's oil terminals as soon as Dec. 15. Armed groups linked to Barqa's federalists have been blockading the oil terminals for months, depriving the country of billions in revenues and increasing global oil prices.

Ibrahim Jathran, the group's leader, made the announcement during a tribal gathering in the town of Nawfaliya. Saleh Latwaish, head of the region's Maghraba tribe, brokered the deal after days of campaigning and meetings between local tribes and federalist leaders. Prime Minister Ali Zeidan and his government welcomed this breakthrough, which will end the crisis that forced them to dip into their reserves to cover the shortfall in government spending. Local tribe leaders were the only party able to successfully end the crisis -- reinforcing the fact that in post-revolution Libya, local is king.

The authorities in Tripoli must reconsider their relationship with key local and regional players in order to achieve stability and ensure a successful democratic transition. The controversial Political Isolation Law passed in May 2013 by the General National Congress (the country's legislative body) bans people like Latwaish from political life because of their links to the Qaddafi regime. Nevertheless, the government continues to rely on these local actors to solve problems that the government cannot.

During a press conference today, Prime Minister Zeidan emphasized that he does not recognise the Barqa Political Office, and that his contacts are only working with local tribal leaders. This indicates that the government and Jathran are still at odds regarding the reopening of the oil terminals -- a dispute that still has the potential to derail negotiations. To make matters worse, the oil workers' union has vowed to keep the terminals closed regardless of any agreement brokered by the federalists, due to disputes over pay and work conditions. (The photo above shows a worker at the Zawiya oil terminal, which closed for several weeks this fall due to similar protests over work conditions and benefits.)

Many doubt that oil terminals will open on Dec. 15 because Jathran's announcement included three demanding conditions. He asked that the central government create an independent investigation panel to look into allegations of widespread corruption in the oil industry; an oversight commission led by representatives from Barqa, Tarabulus, and Fizzan, to oversee all of the National Oil Corporation's marketing and sales deals; and a mechanism to ensure better oil wealth distribution to benefit local economies in oil-rich regions. The government does not seem keen to respond to any of these conditions. The head of the Petroleum Facilities Guards (whose units are in charge of securing oil installations) stated in a press conference on Dec. 11 that Jathran's conditions are only "terms of formality," and are not binding.

Meanwhile, Jathran and his men have come under fire as local communities and tribes demand that they reopen the terminals to ward off the looming financial crisis Libya will face if the blockade continues. Jathran and his government tried to open the terminals to market and sell oil on their own, apart from the central government, but this plan quickly proved unsustainable and legally suspect. Upsetting local populations would be disastrous for Jathran's cause and could worsen the serious divisions within the federalist movement. It is likely, then, that Libya will resume normal levels of oil production and exports for the next few months. Jathran and his men could easily disrupt oil production again.

But in the long term, the central government needs a new strategy for dealing with conflict in its peripheries. Over the last two years, groups have repeatedly held oil installations hostage in pursuit of their financial or political interests. The government must broker a comprehensive political deal to guarantee that local and regional actors have a substantial role in Libya's transition process. Otherwise, the country will continue to face threats to its oil infrastructure.

This recent breakthrough offers the government a valuable opportunity to engage with key local players and involve them in running the region, rather than excluding them. This would build long-term stability and minimize the negative impacts on the oil industry. Recent events in Libya have highlighted the important role local communities can play in Libya's democratic transition. It is crucial that the central authorities, the U.N. Support Mission, and Libya's friends in the West capitalize on the untapped potential of these communities, because they hold the key to solving many of the problems facing post-revolution Libya.

Mohamed Eljarh is the Libya blogger for Transitions. Read the rest of his blog posts here.

MAHMUD TURKIA/AFP/Getty Images